short. People seem to accept that Stone argues his motions by shouting, to compensate for it. It is worth noting multiple witnesses claim a family member confessed to the murder Stone thinks Clemente is guilty of. So Stone does not actually believe confession witnesses. Not even when they aren’t felons being coerced to claim they heard a confession, to get out of prison. Is that evil that he knows he is using liars? Stone was extremely determined to prevent Neisha Cintron from telling the truth about what happened the night Mulrenin died, and giving a window into Mandi J ackson's mind and intentions. Cintron was the only witness at the trial who could tell you what Jackson was actually thinking before she went to Mulrenin's apartment. Everything else is circumstantial, gossip. At Love’s trial, when Recksiedler asked who is this next witness, Stone actually said "Neisha Cintron, the one who talked to Jackson at the end of the night." That is not in the transcript. But that is how aggressive Stone was to make sure Cintron lied that she didn't meet Mandi until the end of the night. Cintron was a hostile witness who needed to be led, to hide what happened throughout the night. And then Stone actually told Cintron on the stand "I don’t want you to tell us anything that Mandi Jackson actually said to you." What Mandi said after closing, right before she left to go meet Mulrenin, is that she wanted a different dress to wear the next night, because Mulrenin did not like either of the two dresses she brought. And Mandi said she would pay Neisha when they both came in to work the next night. Stone's extreme effort to embargo these facts of what Jackson was actually thinking, implies a consciousness on Stone's part that Jackson is not guilty. Mandi told me from prison every single witness lied. There are many reasons for that. After three years, people's memories change. When they read things in the paper or hear gossip, their memories change to what they read in the paper. When they are told Mandi is Charles Manson, they change their story to be good people and fit the police narrative and get justice, making Mulrenin look better and Mandi look worse. And of course the prosecutor directly coaches witnesses to lie, to fit the prosecution narrative. The prosecution spent literally hours getting the judge to block the defense showing what Mandi was there for (and did not steal in 79 minutes of ransacking), marijuana in Mulrenin's apartment. Marijuana was in three places, in two bags, and in plain sight with a pipe on the kitchen counter. Hiding that was a main subject of both trials. The very first trial witness was a software engineer, a precise man, Jerome Ashcroft-Thew. In describing how he could hear what was going on, he described how the previous tenant in Mulrenin's apartment had loud parties he could hear, and the previous tenant in Mulrenin's apartment had marijuana he could smell. He said there were multiple different tenants, not Mulrenin. But he was very precise to make sure to add, he had not heard or smelled anything like that in a year or two, presumably since Mulrenin moved in. Software programmers add lines with precise purposes. Ashcroft was also precise to say the previous parties went until 2AM, not 6AM like this one. Anyone but the jury knows, and the property manager later testified another day (when the jury forgot the point), Mulrenin lived there that whole time. It was always Mulrenin, the noise and marijuana. And as property manager Ervin and Officer Uzzi said, the parties were always until 6 AM, after the strip clubs closed at 2 AM and Mulrenin got off work. Under cross examination, Ashcroft admitted he did not actually know it was a previous tenant, and not Mulrenin the whole time. If you know this case and this trial and this prosecutor, you know he was coached to lie that the noise and weed were from a previous tenant. Ashcroft was coached to add very precise lying lines he later admitted he did not know, to hide that Mulrenin always had noise and marijuana smoke at 6AM. That is how willing and easy a precise man, a total stranger with no direct interest in the case, is to lie under oath. Even Mandi's own roommates, were coached meticulously for two trials, to avoid saying Scott worked in paving. Everyone but the jury knew, Scott worked in paving. Scott is a redhead, pale as a ghost. He had at least two straw hats, the one he wore the night Mulrenin died, and another placed recently in his closet. His roommates admitted he always wore work clothes, which included long-sleeve cotton shirts, and an orange vest. He always wore work clothes and boots, just like he was wearing the night Mulrenin died. Scott even had a pay stub from a paving company that showed he worked the week Mulrenin died. But his roommates were coached over and over to say a pale guy who works in paving in Florida, and who wore long-sleeve cotton shirts and work boots every single day, and who was thoroughly documented to own two straw hats, never wore a straw hat before. What was he doing with IV-6l