III - 3
You might say peers aren't perfect, they are still the best you can hope for, and you asked for them. But the
defendant was granted no similar license, and was hammered with rules at every turn. At the same time, the
witnesses made up stories and bent facts at every step, with no shame, punishment, or remorse.
The jurors' favorite group pastime during recess, was following me around the courthouse saying "Hey, mystery
guy!" and trying to get me to talk about the case with them. The jurors talked about me among themselves, saying I
was "creepy" for telling them "don't talk to me." They asked questions about me, and were asked questions about
me.
I guarantee you the jurors spent hours online finding anything they could about the case and about me. That is one
of the ways they could have come to believe they knew better what happened, and made a decision not based on
anything in evidence or testimony in the courtroom.
The jurors' second-favorite pastime was deliberating among themselves during testimony. And that is just the two
inappropriate pastimes that were visible to me. One juror had a tablet in the jury box, which she insisted she was
only using during bench conferences. A friend of the victim was allowed to sit in the jury box, inform other jurors
that she had information from the day James Mulrenin died, and say how she was certain of Mandi's guilt.
A jury like that was susceptible to gossip. And they were likely distracted by three hours of the worst coerced smear
gossip, which a bizarre technicality of the rules of evidence allows to be presented under the label of "witnesses." I
know something about this case, I have studied it for years and I am familiar with the defendant and the victim. But
the defense cannot pay me to recite what I know, and call it evidence. Not even under the sixth amendment,
according to Judge Recksiedler.
The defendant's lawyers were distracted from the actual details which showed the contents of Mandi Jackson's
mind, by wading through three hours of malicious gossip. As I warned would happen before this trial, the jurors
were overwhelmed with gossip so complicated and insidious and dishonest, it would not be possible to wade
through it in any rational way. That made them vulnerable to going on the web, and becoming possessed with
visions that they had discovered some secret truth.
People in the courtroom, including adversaries of the defendant and/or neutral parties, were shocked with the
verdict. I won't bother naming names because they have no reason to tell you their real opinions or corroborate what
I say. It is not out of disrespect for the justice system that I write all this here. Rather, the justice system was
disrespected and corrupted to reach this verdict. And it needs to be corrected for the court, and the pursuit of justice,
to be respected.
It is not at all clear why Mandi Jackson would have needed to fill out an application to work at the Dollhouse to get
into James Mulrenin's apartment. The prosecution says Scott Love sneaked into the building, and then either went
through a door that Mulrenin frequently left unlocked, or Mandi let him in. I think he knocked. Mandi Jackson
could just as easily have sneaked into the building, and just knocked on Mulrenin's door and asked to borrow some
laundry detergent. It is possible to get into Mulrenin's apartment without ever going to his workplace.
You may have gotten the idea somewhere that we have a presumption of innocence. That the system is designed to
err on the side of freeing the guilty, rather than convicting the innocent. But that is not how this case worked at all.
Nobody ever had any interest in what really happened. Right from the beginning, they were on a mission to do
whatever they had to, to convict Mandi Jackson. They didn't care what the truth was, they weren't even curious. At
all levels of the system, it was a concerted mission to convict the innocent regardless of the truth.
Anyone who expects he will ever get a presumption of innocence, is at risk of a rude awakening. They can just grab
you and use 100 tricks to make you look guilty and lock you up, so you will still be there when the aliens land.
There is no institution to prevent what I just described. There is no institution to guarantee you that presumption of
innocence. You tell me what that institution is, it did nothing for Mandi Jackson.