8. SCOTT LOVE GUILTY - 2019 Love's trial started disaster for the Both defense and prosecution, in their opening said Mulrenin was shot. By the time the jury hearing witnesses at the Lofts, they were longer even sure he was shot. The prosecution did a half-assed of coaching the Lofts to say was shot fleeing. In reality, the first person witness to Mulrenin being shot was the medical examiner days later. So the was confused the people at the Lofts witnessed Mulrenin die, were supposed to provide that he was shot, which they didn't. Scott Love's jury was surprisingly and intelligent to the average person in Seminole County. It was like every different person from of a small business high-tech maybe CEO, some the receptionist, and a who cleans the And were some other normal office people maybe medical workers on jury. met one of the jurors, a young black and movies "Minority Report." She was cool and smart. I impressed, and that of all the lowlifes in Seminole the people report for jury duty are a functional subset. clear to these jurors, the prosecution was over-selling the planned robbery narrative. Prosecutor Stone the tone with a non when he said Mandi and Mulrenin's DNA being on the same straw was evidence was a planned The defense said it was a consensual gathering. From that point forward, the jury ignored the prosecution’s explanations of each piece of began their own explanations of all the evidence. Jurors doubts reinforced when bartender/manager Mellinger casually invented that one of in Mandi's car, was the same Mandi gave Mellinger at Dollhouse two years earlier. The court spent 20 minutes arguing because there two applications, was Then the court basically okay we want you to pick one two identical applications, and lie and say you recognize as the one Mandi you. The have said "Do look basically the same as one Mandi gave you two years ago?" But they to have lie and say "This " one was a piece of paper with Mulrenin's on it. It looks like somebody probably wrote it as the billing address, to try to use his credit card online. But Stone said Mulrenin's on piece of paper was evidence they "targeted him" for robbery. There are millions of addresses on at this and none of them used to target someone for an armed robbery. It doesn't even make sense, and the jury saw that. As a hooker, Mandi wrote hundreds of addresses guys had cash. they would all be good places to rob. any place requires having an address. You can't go restaurant without having the address. So having an cannot be evidence of an intent to do Why every house and business world even have an why would need one, what is the use, just exposes them as easy targets for armed robbery. I have never even seen that in movie, someone write down the address of bank before an armed You have to go the see it, think it, before you get the idea want to rob that bank. So when you first decide to rob it, you have already seen it know where it is. is only by going places, and them, that you first the idea they would be a good place to rob. In movies, they are forced to spoon-feed plot using contrived devices like addresses on paper. these "expository scenes" which are necessary the viewer what is happening, because they are unrealistic and awkward. Prosecutor Stone's presentation in court that day across awkward and contrived, an amateur screenplay. certainly made no sense Mandi wrote down Mulrenin's address to go there and do an armed robbery. Because IV-37 January Scott out as a prosecution. statements, was done from no job witnesses Mulrenin while two jury if who proof normal people compared the office in a field. Like the programmers, person office. there or the I she was girl who loved mysteries, like just was extremely relieved County, who It was set sequitur, that this robbery. evidence, and looking for were the job applications one were job and neither found at Dollhouse. said of these it same gave prosecution could just these applications the were determined her is the one! Another address down address a a written paper moment, are down where In theory Going to to a address armed robbery. does in the address, they it a a robbery. to bank, about you and It to seeing get the Directors dislike to show came as B-movie It that