Kaylee Simmons, pointing how what she said disagreed with I would liked for the jury to multiple from inside the apartment to prove it was not ransacked things were not taken. But that is the small and lawyers looked the big Kaylee is an armed uniquely unfortunate lowlife and bottom-feeder, who would anything or do to anyone, to get less time in prison. They did a great job destroying Julie to where I think Bark was more defending his fellow lawyer Rentz. scumbag witness Madara really in for Mandi's Madara saying some really low things about on the jail phone that I need to repeat. And I think Bark was going after her as much for Carrie as for Mandi. I not saying Bark slacked Mandi. But his best and most zealous part of the involved And I do think the jailhouse witnesses were effective as a distraction, to where Mandi's lawyers did not give rest of the evidence importance or energy they should have. even if the jailhouse witnesses were discredited, Mandi by taking her lawyers' time away from the rest the case they needed about building. And they probably had same effect of and misguiding the jury f1xate on the wrong things. It a total disgrace justice, that the taxpayer pays for the lowest scumbags can find to take over a trial with nonsense. Then Mandi's lawyers presented their narrative of what happened wasn't a robbery. Problem is can't tell the jurors actually happened in Mulrenin's it is not "in evidence." Remember, only witnesses can introduce new information or lies. nobody explained that the jury, so they expect to hear happened. Mandi's laywers can try to sort of tell what really happened, by arguing how the evidence shows what happened. But the prosecution will object, then it will be messy. And there are some reasons they don’t want try. First, they have kind of unwritten that don't say bad things about the victim. if Mulrenin was a monster there, want say have the prosecution say "obj ection, not in evidence." Second, there really no evidence of what Mandi is there There is no evidence she is a hooker who fucks old guys for money. There was no evidence she likes to weed. So they can't really say much without the judge going crazy, Mandi just thought was a great Finally as local lawyers who know what judge will say, they may foresee how the limited parts the they might be to get across, could create more than it solves. example, with duct which I will get to later. Mandi's lawyers told brief narrative that was a little hard believe. Mandi just a regular girl who home with with a regular guy, and cheated on her boyfriend. They said Scott came in and to tie them both or I don’t even know. They even said Scott’s DNA was on the ties, which it wasn’t. And then Mulrenin went over the balcony? I don’t even remember, because it wasn’t clear. boyfriend tracked her broke up violently, and submitted to her boyfriend and went back to him. the jurors maybe found it to believe Scott would come in and catch his girlfriend and shoot the guy and to tie him up, and then Mandi would go home with him and credit cards like nothing happened. jury may be smart to believe that, because it never happened, as I will to I tell you what I believe happened. But just because it never happened exactly that, does not prove the explanation, that Mandi a principal in a robbery. Something like what Mandi's lawyers described did happen, and not like what the prosecutor described. And the jurors were supposed to be able to figure out the basic idea of Mandi's narrative was right, it was something other than a robbery. But what were supposed to figure out based on, that Kaylee said Mandi was trafficked she was a teenage hooker had pimp, maybe didn't the jurors as much as was supposed to, explain who Mandi was. As Mandi's lawyer Bark said to me, the jurors might even "trafficked" So they quite that Mandi is a submissive sex toy who gets passed around by violent guys who are the boss of her. It would have Mulrenin was a convicted pimp, since jurors probably a strip-club a manager. they might have understood are like normal boyfriends, where Mandi out all the physical evidence. have see pictures and details, Mandi's at picture. robber and say anything Madara, Carrie Jailhouse had it lawyer Carrie. was Carrie don't zealous about am for trial Carrie. the the So they convicted of to worry the confusing to is just to they murder irrelevant that they what apartment. Because new But to exactly what and to some rule you So the truth is in they don't to it and is for. allowed smoke except Mulrenin guy. the of story able problems For the tape, more So a to was went tried up, cable Her down and it Mandi But hard cheating try use The not get when like prosecution’s alternative was they it meaning who a play into thinking it to not know what means. never got helped to know think manager is like roller-rink Then these not IV-7l