looked at the defendant and nodded her head, and used her eyes say "yes, you did it." The jurors became emotionally possessed with an epiphany of guilt, such a sudden lightbulb, an moment, not come any testimony evidence in the courtroom. It circumstantial case, bolstered by jailhouse witnesses with felonies and crimes of between who their sentences reduced for what they said, and who came across as biased and creepy. Even someone who to be convinced of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, had no reason be joyous about the the alternate was, given murky circumstances. Nobody have given serious contemplation to what they heard in a ﬁrst-degree trial, with no physical of the of Jackson's mind, under two of deliberations. Maybe it just that, absence of any indications of the contents of Mandi's mind, the perjury by Neisha Cintron that whole the refusal by the judge to show the weed in the Put simply, there was nothing in the to convince them of guilt beyond a doubt, more than a hunch, and it didn't matter. So, a jury has right to kill people because they feel like it, and no judge, or in this case no prancing secretary, is going to them. a killing world, and come from it and will return to They to someone's daughter on a hunch, that their business. kill young girls, and that is that. Stone probably knew the look and see Mandi supposedly got caught with a gun in Georgia, which not even hers. So made sure to emphasize to jury the was Mandi's gun, which is completely ridiculous. guarantee you those jurors looked Mandi up online. I would bet my eyeballs on against a doughnut. And I guarantee the to the of the page was covered with the word I don’t know if you allowed to during jury selection with the following questions to individual jurors: 1. you use a guy's credit cards, that doesn't mean murdered him. 2. If you go from guy A to and back to guy A, doesn't mean were with A the whole time. 3. If accused you of something, that doesn't it happened, not in Florida or any other you may about. Everybody in jury box agrees with IV-79 to where "a—ha" could have from or was a 22 dishonesty them, got saying managed to conclusion like the could six-day murder evidence contents Mandi in hours was the erased the night, kitchen. courtroom Mandi's reasonable nothing the legal stop It's jurors it. want kill based is People jury would online was Stone the revolver I it top bottom "GHB." would be pre-try If you guy B that you guy police you mean state read the that?